COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA v RUNDLE [1989] NSWCA 44
No error was shown in Bignold J's exercise of discretion in refusing to excuse the Commonwealth from production of confidential documents except those involving business confidences, and the balancing of public interest factors was appropriately undertaken; no basis for appellate intervention existed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Commonwealth of Australia; Respondent: Rundle
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Summons for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision on Interlocutory Order
- Outcome
- Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Immunity, Crown Privilege, Production of Documents, Environmental Law, Interlocutory Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commonwealth of Australia
Applicant
Rundle
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Summons for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision on Interlocutory Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Commonwealth should be excused from producing certain confidential documents on grounds of public interest immunity
- 2 Whether Bignold J's discretionary decision regarding document production involved error warranting appellate intervention
Ratio Decidendi
No error was shown in Bignold J's exercise of discretion in refusing to excuse the Commonwealth from production of confidential documents except those involving business confidences, and the balancing of public interest factors was appropriately undertaken; no basis for appellate intervention existed.
Court Disposition
Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Summons dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment