Commonwealth v Bourne [1960] HCA 26
The evidence does not establish Bourne's heart disease or death was due to the nature of the employment, nor was the death a personal injury by accident arising from employment; compensation cannot be awarded under s. 9 or s. 10 of the Commonwealth Employees' Compensation Act 1930-1956.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Written Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ["employees' Compensation" 'occupational Disease' 'causation in Compensation Claims']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Written Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Bourne's death was due to the nature of his employment for compensation under s. 10 of the Commonwealth Employees' Compensation Act 1930-1956" 'Whether the death constituted a personal injury by accident arising out of employment under s. 9' "The meaning and application of 'nature of the employment' in compensation claims"]
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence does not establish Bourne's heart disease or death was due to the nature of the employment, nor was the death a personal injury by accident arising from employment; compensation cannot be awarded under s. 9 or s. 10 of the Commonwealth Employees' Compensation Act 1930-1956.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Discharge the order of the County Court at Melbourne.' "Dismiss the appeal to the County Court from the Delegate of the Commissioner for Employees' Compensation." "The Commonwealth to pay the respondent's costs of appeal to the High Court." 'No order as to costs for the County Court appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment