ASH STREET PROPERTIES PTY LIMITED v POLLNOW [1995] NSWCA 25
Reinstatement of the companies under s 574 of the Corporations Law validated all procedural steps taken in their name for taxation of costs, and the claimants' arguments regarding lack of authority and director tenure failed in light of legislative provisions and binding precedents.
- Parties
- Claimant: Ash Street Properties Pty Limited; Opponent: Errol Pollnow
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 September 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Motion / Decision on Notice of Motion Regarding Stay and Setting Aside of Certificates of Taxation
- Outcome
- motion dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Company Reinstatement, Taxation of Costs, Solicitors' Authority, Joint Entitlement to Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ash Street Properties Pty Limited
Claimant
Errol Pollnow
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Motion / Decision on Notice of Motion Regarding Stay and Setting Aside of Certificates of Taxation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether reinstatement of deregistered companies retrospectively validates procedural steps taken in their names
- 2 Authority of solicitors to file bills of costs on behalf of dissolved companies whose property vested in ASC
- 3 Whether deregistration affects directors' tenure affecting proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Reinstatement of the companies under s 574 of the Corporations Law validated all procedural steps taken in their name for taxation of costs, and the claimants' arguments regarding lack of authority and director tenure failed in light of legislative provisions and binding precedents.
Court Disposition
motion dismissed with costs
Orders
- Motion dismissed with costs.
- Existing stays of execution are continued until fourteen (14) days after the making of these orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment