Compaq Computer Australia Pty Ltd v Merry, Howard & Ors [1996] FCA 212
Leave to amend is granted to the applicant to file and serve an amended statement of claim excluding paragraphs 17 to 21B, as those pleadings lack sufficient allegation of facts necessary to support causes of action under Corporations Law ss 232(4), 232(6), and 1324. The remaining amendments supply proper particularity and satisfy the applicant’s pleading obligations in accordance with prior orders.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim / Interlocutory (leave to Amend Pleadings)
- Outcome
- Leave to amend statement of claim granted in part
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Pleadings' 'trusts' 'fiduciary Duties' 'directors’ Duties' 'trade Practices Act Claims' 's 1324 Corporations Law Damages']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim / Interlocutory (leave to Amend Pleadings)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted leave to amend the statement of claim as proposed in the February 1996 draft, including new causes of action based on Corporations Law ss 232(4), 232(6), and 1324, and whether the draft supplies sufficient particularity.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend is granted to the applicant to file and serve an amended statement of claim excluding paragraphs 17 to 21B, as those pleadings lack sufficient allegation of facts necessary to support causes of action under Corporations Law ss 232(4), 232(6), and 1324. The remaining amendments supply proper particularity and satisfy the applicant’s pleading obligations in accordance with prior orders.
Court Disposition
Leave to amend statement of claim granted in part
Orders
- ['Applicant to have leave to file and serve within 7 days an amended statement of claim excluding paragraphs 17 to 21B and correcting typographical and drafting errors.' 'Applicant to pay respondents’ costs of the application to amend and any costs thrown away by the amendment.' 'Directions hearing adjourned to 2...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment