Ange v Contos [2020] NSWSC 64

Ange v Contos [2020] NSWSC 64

None of the grounds for appeal raised a question of law alone; to the extent any ground raised a question of mixed law and fact, leave to appeal was refused. The original magistrate's decision to dismiss the claim was based on a failure by the plaintiffs to discharge their burden of proof, with the magistrate not accepting the evidence of either party.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 February 2020
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['admissibility of Evidence' 'burden of Proof' 'leave to Appeal' 'adequacy of Reasons' 'costs']
['contract Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['admissibility of Evidence' 'burden of Proof' 'leave to Appeal' 'adequacy of Reasons' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the appeal raises a question of law alone or requires leave as a mixed question of law and fact' "Whether the magistrate's ruling on admissibility of evidence was an error of law" 'Whether the magistrate provided adequate reasons for her decision' 'Whether the plaintiffs discharged their burden of proof' 'Whether costs order was correctly made']

Ratio Decidendi

None of the grounds for appeal raised a question of law alone; to the extent any ground raised a question of mixed law and fact, leave to appeal was refused. The original magistrate's decision to dismiss the claim was based on a failure by the plaintiffs to discharge their burden of proof, with the magistrate not accepting the evidence of either party.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ["The plaintiffs' summons is dismissed with costs."]