Kakakios v Hunter’s Hill Council [2018] NSWLEC 1414
An agreement having been reached between the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner being satisfied that the decision was one the Court could have made, the appeal was upheld and the development application approved subject to agreed conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'dual Occupancy' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties' 'section 34 Land and Environment Court Act 1979']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Development Application No. DA20171075 should be approved after refusal by Council' 'Whether the proposed variation to the Minimum Subdivision Lot Size under cl 4.1 of Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012 should be upheld']
Ratio Decidendi
An agreement having been reached between the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner being satisfied that the decision was one the Court could have made, the appeal was upheld and the development application approved subject to agreed conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions
Orders
- ['The applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans and documents referred to in the conditions of consent.' 'The clause 4.6 written request to vary the Minimum Subdivision Lot Size control under cl 4.1 of Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012 is upheld.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment