Tsekouras v Evangelinidis [2001] NSWSC 638

Tsekouras v Evangelinidis [2001] NSWSC 638

The plaintiff had already litigated the issue as to how much he owed the solicitor, so the claim fell within res judicata. The statement of claim was hopeless, doomed to failure, and its deficiencies could not be cured by amendment. Although costs should follow the event, the case did not warrant indemnity costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment / Defendant's Notice of Motion to Dismiss Proceedings Under Part 13 R 5 of the Supreme Court Rules
Outcome
Statement of claim dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant's costs on a party/party basis.
Legal Topics
['summary Judgment' 'dismissal of Statement of Claim' 'res Judicata' 'indemnity Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment / Defendant's Notice of Motion to Dismiss Proceedings Under Part 13 R 5 of the Supreme Court Rules

  1. 1 ['Whether the statement of claim should be dismissed under Part 13 r 5 of the Supreme Court Rules because it disclosed no reasonable cause of action, was frivolous or vexatious, or was an abuse of process.' "Whether the plaintiff's claim was barred by res judicata because the issue had already been litigated." "Whether the plaintiff should be ordered to pay the defendant's costs on an indemnity basis."]

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff had already litigated the issue as to how much he owed the solicitor, so the claim fell within res judicata. The statement of claim was hopeless, doomed to failure, and its deficiencies could not be cured by amendment. Although costs should follow the event, the case did not warrant indemnity costs.

Court Disposition

Statement of claim dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant's costs on a party/party basis.

Orders

  • ['The statement of claim is dismissed.' "The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs."]