Conceal Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 49

Conceal Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 49

The appeal failed because the proposed 13 lot subdivision was premature and an overdevelopment of a constrained, flood-liable site. Although access via Meryla Road was not a sufficient reason for refusal, the magnitude and interim nature of the required drainage diversion, filling, swales, retaining structures, works on council land and future reinstatement costs would adversely affect landscape, scenic quality and residential amenity, raise public interest and maintenance concerns, and fail to satisfy the Residential 2(a) zone objectives and cl 51 of the Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan 1989.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application for Residential Subdivision / Judgment Following Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed and development consent refused.
Legal Topics
['residential Subdivision' 'development Consent' 'flood Affected Land' 'drainage and Filling Works' 'access' "owner's Consent for Works on Council Land" 'public Interest' 'zone Objectives']
['planning and Environmental Law' 'land and Environment Court Proceedings'] ['residential Subdivision' 'development Consent' 'flood Affected Land' 'drainage and Filling Works' 'access' "owner's Consent for Works on Council Land" 'public Interest' 'zone Objectives']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application for Residential Subdivision / Judgment Following Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the proposed access arrangements for the 13 lot subdivision were adequate and safe.' 'Whether the proposed drainage diversion, filling and external works were acceptable having regard to flooding, environmental impacts and planning controls.' "Whether the Court should exercise discretion under s 39 of the Land and Environment Court Act in relation to owner's consent for works on council land." 'Whether the proposal was in the public interest and represented orderly and economic development of the land.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal failed because the proposed 13 lot subdivision was premature and an overdevelopment of a constrained, flood-liable site. Although access via Meryla Road was not a sufficient reason for refusal, the magnitude and interim nature of the required drainage diversion, filling, swales, retaining structures, works on council land and future reinstatement costs would adversely affect landscape, scenic quality and residential amenity, raise public interest and maintenance concerns, and fail to satisfy the Residential 2(a) zone objectives and cl 51 of the Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan 1989.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed and development consent refused.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'Development consent for a 13 lot subdivision at Lot 24 DP 713573 Loftus Street and Meryla Road, Bowral, is refused.' 'The exhibits may be returned except for Exhibits 7, 31, 35, 36, A and L.']