Conco Systems Inc v Specialised Overhaul Service Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 286

Conco Systems Inc v Specialised Overhaul Service Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 286

Leave to discontinue was granted as Conco no longer wished to prosecute the matter for its own reasons, but on terms that the applicant pays respondents’ costs and undertakes not to bring further claims based on the matters in issue; summary dismissal was refused as non-compliance with directions was not sufficiently contumelious and there was no basis to conclude the claim was doomed to fail at this stage.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 March 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil / Leave to Discontinue and Costs Determination; Summary Dismissal Application by Second Respondent
Outcome
Applicant granted leave to discontinue proceedings on terms; second respondent's summary dismissal application dismissed; applicant to pay respondents' costs up to and including the date of the order.
Legal Topics
['breach of Confidence' 'interference With Contractual Relations' 'patent and Registered Design Proceedings' 'discontinuance of Proceedings' 'costs Orders' 'summary Dismissal']
['intellectual Property' 'contract Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['breach of Confidence' 'interference With Contractual Relations' 'patent and Registered Design Proceedings' 'discontinuance of Proceedings' 'costs Orders' 'summary Dismissal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Leave to Discontinue and Costs Determination; Summary Dismissal Application by Second Respondent

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to the applicant to discontinue proceedings against the respondents' "Whether the applicant should pay the respondents' costs upon discontinuance" 'Whether the proceedings against the second respondent should be summarily dismissed for failure to comply with court directions or being doomed to failure']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to discontinue was granted as Conco no longer wished to prosecute the matter for its own reasons, but on terms that the applicant pays respondents’ costs and undertakes not to bring further claims based on the matters in issue; summary dismissal was refused as non-compliance with directions was not sufficiently contumelious and there was no basis to conclude the claim was doomed to fail at this stage.

Court Disposition

Applicant granted leave to discontinue proceedings on terms; second respondent's summary dismissal application dismissed; applicant to pay respondents' costs up to and including the date of the order.

Orders

  • ['The notice of motion of the second respondent of 5 March 1999 is dismissed.' 'The applicant is given leave to discontinue the proceedings.' 'The applicant is to pay the respondents’ costs of the proceedings up to and including today.']