Concrete Recyclers (Group) Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council [2005] NSWLEC 758
The modification to operating hours and stockpile height is permissible as the evidence, including expert assessment, indicates that with the imposed conditions, there will be no unacceptable impact in terms of noise, dust emissions, or visual amenity, and public benefits will be achieved by further agreed conditions.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Refusal of S 96 Modification Application
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; modification application approved with conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'modification Application' 'hours of Operation' 'dust Emissions' 'visual Impact']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Refusal of S 96 Modification Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the s 96 Modification application for the concrete recycling facility should be approved, particularly regarding changes to hours of operation and increased height of stockpiles' 'Potential noise disamenity, dust emissions, and visual impacts of the proposed modifications']
Ratio Decidendi
The modification to operating hours and stockpile height is permissible as the evidence, including expert assessment, indicates that with the imposed conditions, there will be no unacceptable impact in terms of noise, dust emissions, or visual amenity, and public benefits will be achieved by further agreed conditions.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; modification application approved with conditions
Orders
- ['The appeal is allowed.' 'The s 96 application to modify conditions of consent for the concrete recycling operation at 14 Thackeray Street, Camellia, is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.' 'The exhibits may be returned except for Exhibits 2 (Tables 14, 12), 3 and C.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment