Concretive BHV Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2024] NSWLEC 1784
The modified development is substantially the same as approved, increases in height and FSR are justified by planning objectives and minimal amenity impact, and the agreement reached under conciliation is a decision the Court could properly make.
- Parties
- Applicant: Concretive BHV Pty Ltd; Respondent: Woollahra Municipal Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Determination Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent modified as sought
- Legal Topics
- Modification of Development Consent, Development Standards, Conciliation Conference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Concretive BHV Pty Ltd
Applicant
Woollahra Municipal Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Determination Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the modified development is substantially the same as originally consented development
- 2 Whether modification meets requirements under Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 4.55(2)
- 3 Compliance with height and floor space ratio development standards under Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 2014
Ratio Decidendi
The modified development is substantially the same as approved, increases in height and FSR are justified by planning objectives and minimal amenity impact, and the agreement reached under conciliation is a decision the Court could properly make.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent modified as sought
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development Consent No. 136/2023/1 for the substantial demolition of the existing residential flat building and the construction of a new residential flat building with basement car parking, at 206B Victoria Road, Bellevue Hill, is modified by Modification Application No. 136/2023/2, in the terms set out at Annexure...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment