CONCRITE PTY LTD v ROGERSON [2002] NSWCA 310

CONCRITE PTY LTD v ROGERSON [2002] NSWCA 310

The appeal was allowed due to internal inconsistencies and insufficiency of reasons in the trial judge's findings regarding causation, assessment of damages, and application of the burden of proof, making it necessary to remit proceedings for a retrial limited to damages.

Parties
Appellant: Concrite Pty Ltd; Respondent: Bruce Rogerson
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 September 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From District Court Decision; Judgment of Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; verdict and judgment set aside; new trial ordered on damages; restitution ordered.
Legal Topics
Causation, Assessment of Damages, Onus of Proof, Workers Compensation
Negligence Personal Injury Causation Assessment of Damages Onus of Proof Workers Compensation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Concrite Pty Ltd

Appellant

Bruce Rogerson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From District Court Decision; Judgment of Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether trial judge's reasoning as to causation was internally inconsistent
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge misapplied the onus of proof
  3. 3 Whether reasons provided for damages (economic and non-economic loss) were insufficient

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was allowed due to internal inconsistencies and insufficiency of reasons in the trial judge's findings regarding causation, assessment of damages, and application of the burden of proof, making it necessary to remit proceedings for a retrial limited to damages.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; verdict and judgment set aside; new trial ordered on damages; restitution ordered.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed
  • Set aside the verdict and judgment for the respondent given and entered by Judge Gibb on 26 November 2001