Bolten v Stoltenberg [2016] NSWSC 596
Imputations using 'Captain's Call' and 'corruptly' are sufficiently precise to go to the jury; duplication of pleadings is permissible provided there is no double recovery of damages; imputations relying on the term 'Fine Cotton ring-in' and unsupported allegations are struck out for lack of precision or inability to arise.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Ruling on Objections to Pleadings
- Outcome
- Parties directed to bring in short minutes to reflect rulings on pleadings given in the judgment; some objections upheld; some imputations struck out; others allowed to proceed to the jury.
- Legal Topics
- ['pleadings' 'imputations' 'precision of Pleading' 'duplication of Imputations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Ruling on Objections to Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether certain imputations pleaded in defamation proceedings are sufficiently precise to be allowed to go to the jury' "Whether the plaintiff's pleadings improperly duplicate imputations by pleading the same publication as separate publications in different forms" "Whether certain terms (e.g., 'Captain's Call', 'Fine Cotton ring-in', 'corruptly') are capable of giving rise to imputations and are sufficiently precise in context"]
Ratio Decidendi
Imputations using 'Captain's Call' and 'corruptly' are sufficiently precise to go to the jury; duplication of pleadings is permissible provided there is no double recovery of damages; imputations relying on the term 'Fine Cotton ring-in' and unsupported allegations are struck out for lack of precision or inability to arise.
Court Disposition
Parties directed to bring in short minutes to reflect rulings on pleadings given in the judgment; some objections upheld; some imputations struck out; others allowed to proceed to the jury.
Orders
- ["Parties to bring in short minutes reflecting the Court's rulings on the pleadings." 'Imputations 5(a), (b), and (c) allowed to go to the jury.' 'Imputation 5(c) allowed to stand.' "Objection to 'Captain's Call' imputation withdrawn." "Imputation using 'Fine Cotton ring-in' is struck out." "Imputation 7(c) in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment