Consolidated Media Holdings Limited, in the matter of Consolidated Media Holdings Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 1224

Consolidated Media Holdings Limited, in the matter of Consolidated Media Holdings Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 1224

The Court approved the Scheme because the Scheme Meeting was convened in accordance with the earlier orders, the required shareholder approval was obtained by substantial majorities, ASIC had no objection, the hearing was properly advertised, no one opposed approval, the deed poll date omission was only a minor...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 November 2012
Procedural Posture
Application for Approval of a Scheme of Arrangement Under S 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / Second Court Hearing; Application for Orders Approving the Scheme
Outcome
Scheme of arrangement approved.
Legal Topics
['scheme of Arrangement' 'shareholder Approval' 'court Approval Under S 411' 'procedural Irregularity' 'asic No Objection']
['corporations Law'] ['scheme of Arrangement' 'shareholder Approval' 'court Approval Under S 411' 'procedural Irregularity' 'asic No Objection']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Approval of a Scheme of Arrangement Under S 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / Second Court Hearing; Application for Orders Approving the Scheme

  1. 1 ["Whether the Scheme Meeting was convened in accordance with the Court's orders and statutory requirements." 'Whether the shareholder approval prerequisites in s 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) were satisfied.' 'Whether omission of the date of the deed poll from the Scheme booklet required alteration or prevented approval of the Scheme.' 'Whether failure to despatch Scheme documents to shareholders entered on the register after 7pm on 20 September 2012 impeded approval of the Scheme.' 'Whether the Scheme should be approved under s 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court approved the Scheme because the Scheme Meeting was convened in accordance with the earlier orders, the required shareholder approval was obtained by substantial majorities, ASIC had no objection, the hearing was properly advertised, no one opposed approval, the deed poll date omission was only a minor technical matter, any notice issue for new shareholders was at most a procedural irregularity causing no substantial injustice, and the evidence supported that the Scheme was fair and reasonable and one an intelligent and honest shareholder might approve.

Court Disposition

Scheme of arrangement approved.

Orders

  • ['Pursuant to s 411(4)(b) and s 411(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the scheme of arrangement between the plaintiff and the holders of ordinary shares in the plaintiff in the form contained in Attachment 2 of the Scheme Booklet, Exhibit 1 in the proceeding, be approved subject to altering the definition of...