Davis v Healey [2019] NSWSC 820

Davis v Healey [2019] NSWSC 820

The deed formed part of a proposed trust arrangement under which the defendant would transfer his interest in the Woodford property and the mortgage debt would be reduced from $140,000 to $60,000; that arrangement was not approved by the Family Court, did not come to fruition, and was never finalised. The defendant did not prove the alleged later amended agreement. The consent orders were a compromise made when both parties were legally represented, and the defendant produced no evidence from his solicitor or any basis amounting to illegality, misrepresentation, non-disclosure of a material fact, duress, mistake, undue influence, abuse of confidence, or another ground rendering the orders...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 July 2019
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Consent Orders in Possession Proceedings Based on Alleged Mortgage Default / Defendant's Amended Notice of Motion Filed 4 April 2019
Outcome
The defendant's amended notice of motion filed 4 April 2019 is dismissed, with the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs on an ordinary basis.
Legal Topics
['application to Set Aside Consent Orders' 'default of Mortgage' 'whether Subsequent Deed Superseded Mortgage' 'whether Agreement Varied Mortgage']
['practice and Procedure' 'property Law' 'mortgages'] ['application to Set Aside Consent Orders' 'default of Mortgage' 'whether Subsequent Deed Superseded Mortgage' 'whether Agreement Varied Mortgage']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application to Set Aside Consent Orders in Possession Proceedings Based on Alleged Mortgage Default / Defendant's Amended Notice of Motion Filed 4 April 2019

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the consent orders made on 19 November 2018 should be set aside' 'Whether the deed of acknowledgement of debt and loan superseded or varied the mortgage dated 22 September 2016' 'Whether there was a legal or equitable ground making the consent orders void or voidable or otherwise justifying relief']

Ratio Decidendi

The deed formed part of a proposed trust arrangement under which the defendant would transfer his interest in the Woodford property and the mortgage debt would be reduced from $140,000 to $60,000; that arrangement was not approved by the Family Court, did not come to fruition, and was never finalised. The defendant did not prove the alleged later amended agreement. The consent orders were a compromise made when both parties were legally represented, and the defendant produced no evidence from his solicitor or any basis amounting to illegality, misrepresentation, non-disclosure of a material fact, duress, mistake, undue influence, abuse of confidence, or another ground rendering the orders...

Court Disposition

The defendant's amended notice of motion filed 4 April 2019 is dismissed, with the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs on an ordinary basis.

Orders

  • ["The defendant's amended notice of motion filed 4 April 2019 is dismissed." "The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs on an ordinary basis."]