Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Hay Point Services Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 182

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Hay Point Services Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 182

Clause 34.1 of the Enterprise Agreement, when properly construed, imposes a restriction on Hay Point Services Pty Ltd that only reasonable overtime may be required of employees; contravening this restriction constitutes a breach under s 50 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 October 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment, Orders and Reasons
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
['enterprise Agreement Interpretation' 'reasonable Overtime' 'contravention of Enterprise Agreement']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Post Judgment, Orders and Reasons

  1. 1 ['Whether clause 34.1 of the Enterprise Agreement creates an obligation capable of being contravened by the employer under s 50 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)' 'The proper construction of the overtime provisions in the Enterprise Agreement']

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 34.1 of the Enterprise Agreement, when properly construed, imposes a restriction on Hay Point Services Pty Ltd that only reasonable overtime may be required of employees; contravening this restriction constitutes a breach under s 50 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • ['The appeal is allowed.' "The primary judge's order dismissing the application is set aside." "The proceeding is remitted to the primary judge for further determination in accordance with the Full Court's reasons." 'No order for costs.']