Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union [1999] FCA 407
There was no serious question to be tried that the respondent contravened s 170MN(1) of the Act, as the industrial action in question was not taken for the purpose of supporting or advancing claims within the meaning of the section; the application for interlocutory relief was therefore dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for interlocutory relief dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Injunction' 'industrial Action' 'certified Agreements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether employees' stoppage constituted industrial action in contravention of s 170MN(1) of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth)" 'Whether the statutory precondition for granting an injunction under s 170NG is satisfied']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no serious question to be tried that the respondent contravened s 170MN(1) of the Act, as the industrial action in question was not taken for the purpose of supporting or advancing claims within the meaning of the section; the application for interlocutory relief was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for interlocutory relief dismissed
Orders
- ['The application for interlocutory relief is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment