Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Billiton Nickel West Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 991
Section 484 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) confers a right of entry to hold discussions with employees only during their mealtimes or other breaks, not before commencement of their scheduled working hours; 'other breaks' does not include time before a shift starts. There was therefore no contravention by the respondents in refusing entry at 5.15am when no relevant break was occurring.
- Parties
- Applicant: Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union; First Respondent: BHP Billiton Nickel West Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Stacey Scaffardi; Third Respondent: Micahel Constable
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Right of Entry, Interpretation of Fair Work Act 2009 (cth) Sections 484 and 490, Statutory Construction, Balance of Rights (organisations, Employees, Occupiers)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
Applicant
BHP Billiton Nickel West Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Stacey Scaffardi
Second Respondent
Micahel Constable
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s 484 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) gives a right of entry to union officials for the purpose of holding discussions with employees before the commencement of their scheduled working hours
- 2 Meaning of 'mealtimes or other breaks' in s 490(2) of the Fair Work Act
- 3 Whether refusal of entry at a time before a shift is a contravention of s 501
Ratio Decidendi
Section 484 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) confers a right of entry to hold discussions with employees only during their mealtimes or other breaks, not before commencement of their scheduled working hours; 'other breaks' does not include time before a shift starts. There was therefore no contravention by the respondents in refusing entry at 5.15am when no relevant break was occurring.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The proceeding is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment