BGC Contracting Pty Ltd v The Construction Forestry Mining & Energy Union of Workers (No 2) [2005] FCA 908
The application was in a matter arising under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) because the declarations sought depended upon the existence and operation of rights conferred by that Act, specifically regarding AWAs and rights of entry. Therefore, the limitation on awarding costs in s 347 applied and, as the proceedings were not frivolous or vexatious, no order for costs should be made.
- Parties
- First Applicant: BGC Contracting Pty Ltd; Second Applicant: Shamrock Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Killarnee Formwork; Third Applicant: SNC-Lavalin (SA) Inc; Respondent: Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union of Workers
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Declarations and Costs / Post Trial Costs Determination
- Outcome
- No order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Federal State Inconsistency, Jurisdiction, Rights of Entry, Constitution S 109
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BGC Contracting Pty Ltd
First Applicant
Shamrock Holdings Pty Ltd T/A Killarnee Formwork
Second Applicant
SNC-Lavalin (SA) Inc
Third Applicant
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union of Workers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Declarations and Costs / Post Trial Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings were in a matter arising under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) for the purposes of applying s 347 (costs provision)
- 2 Whether rights of entry under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) are inconsistent with rights under the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA)
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded
Ratio Decidendi
The application was in a matter arising under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) because the declarations sought depended upon the existence and operation of rights conferred by that Act, specifically regarding AWAs and rights of entry. Therefore, the limitation on awarding costs in s 347 applied and, as the proceedings were not frivolous or vexatious, no order for costs should be made.
Court Disposition
No order as to costs
Orders
- Each party is to bear its own costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment