Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Clarke [2007] FCAFC 8
Section 24(1)(a) of the Federal Court Act permits appeals to the Full Court from judgments of a single judge exercising either original or appellate jurisdiction, including appeals from a State Court of summary jurisdiction, and neither s 25(5) nor previous authorities restrict such appeals; accordingly, the respondent's motion to dismiss the appeal as incompetent is rejected.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Incompetent Before Full Court
- Outcome
- motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['appeals' 'federal Court Jurisdiction' 'statutory Interpretation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Incompetent Before Full Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an appeal lies to the Full Court from a judgment of a single judge of the Federal Court exercising appellate jurisdiction from a State Court of summary jurisdiction']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 24(1)(a) of the Federal Court Act permits appeals to the Full Court from judgments of a single judge exercising either original or appellate jurisdiction, including appeals from a State Court of summary jurisdiction, and neither s 25(5) nor previous authorities restrict such appeals; accordingly, the respondent's motion to dismiss the appeal as incompetent is rejected.
Court Disposition
motion dismissed
Orders
- ["The respondent's motion seeking orders pursuant to O 52 r 18(1) of the Federal Court Rules be dismissed." "The respondent pay the appellants' costs of and incidental to the motion."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment