Construction Forestry Mining & Energy Union & Ors v Full Bench, Australian Industrial Relations Commission & Anor [1998] FCA 1791

Construction Forestry Mining & Energy Union & Ors v Full Bench, Australian Industrial Relations Commission & Anor [1998] FCA 1791

No stay is granted as there is no substantial prospect of success shown in the High Court, there are no seriously irreparable consequences identified, and the balance of convenience does not favour the stay.

Parties
Applicant: Construction Forestry Mining & Energy Union & Ors; First Respondent: Full Bench, Australian Industrial Relations Commission; Second Respondent: Coal and Allied Operations Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 December 1998
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay / Interlocutory (application for Stay of Full Court Orders Pending High Court Special Leave)
Outcome
Application for stay refused; motion by second respondent dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Application for Stay, Workplace Relations Act, Industrial Relations Commission Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Construction Forestry Mining & Energy Union & Ors

Applicant

Full Bench, Australian Industrial Relations Commission

First Respondent

Coal and Allied Operations Pty Limited

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Stay / Interlocutory (application for Stay of Full Court Orders Pending High Court Special Leave)

  1. 1 Whether to grant a stay of the Federal Court Full Court's orders pending the High Court special leave application

Ratio Decidendi

No stay is granted as there is no substantial prospect of success shown in the High Court, there are no seriously irreparable consequences identified, and the balance of convenience does not favour the stay.

Court Disposition

Application for stay refused; motion by second respondent dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The motion filed by the second respondent on 23 December is dismissed with costs.