Shaw and Partners Ltd v Netlinkz Ltd [2025] NSWDC 26
The Court found that the Mandate and the 29 July letter require the defendant to pay the plaintiff 5% of the total amount committed in the EFA, $20.5 million, calculated at $1,025,000 plus GST, and that amendments in the 29 July letter affect the timing, not amount, of payment; thus, the defendant's alternative interpretations and cross-claims fail.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/cross Defendant: Shaw and Partners Ltd; Defendant/cross Claimant: Netlinkz Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiff; cross-claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Construction and Interpretation, Promissory Estoppel, Representation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shaw and Partners Ltd
Plaintiff/cross Defendant
Netlinkz Ltd
Defendant/cross Claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover 5% of the proposed issue of $20,500,000 or only 5% of amounts actually received under the EFA
- 2 Whether the 29 July letter entitles the plaintiff to a reduced fee or affects timing only
- 3 Whether the defendant is entitled to restitution of amounts paid
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Mandate and the 29 July letter require the defendant to pay the plaintiff 5% of the total amount committed in the EFA, $20.5 million, calculated at $1,025,000 plus GST, and that amendments in the 29 July letter affect the timing, not amount, of payment; thus, the defendant's alternative interpretations and cross-claims fail.
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiff; cross-claim dismissed
Orders
- Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of $577,500 including GST.
- Dismiss the cross-claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment