MANILDRA FLOUR MILLS MANUFACTURING PTY LTD v BELTAVIA PTY LTD [1989] NSWCA 137
The contract required the calculation and payment for wheat based on an agreed formula relating to flour delivered and a grist rate, not by reference to actual wheat delivered; this construction applied to all relevant periods and claims; thus, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover alleged overpayments.
- Parties
- Appellant / Defendant: Manildra Flour Mills Manufacturing Pty Ltd; Respondent / Plaintiff: Beltavia Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Judgment below set aside. Summons dismissed. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff to pay costs at first instance and on appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Contract, Overpayment, Apportionment of Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Manildra Flour Mills Manufacturing Pty Ltd
Appellant / Defendant
Beltavia Pty Ltd
Respondent / Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether payment for wheat was to be made on wheat actually delivered or wheat deemed delivered under an agreed formula
- 2 Whether the judgment at first instance determined the whole of the plaintiff's claim or only part of it
Ratio Decidendi
The contract required the calculation and payment for wheat based on an agreed formula relating to flour delivered and a grist rate, not by reference to actual wheat delivered; this construction applied to all relevant periods and claims; thus, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover alleged overpayments.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Judgment below set aside. Summons dismissed. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff to pay costs at first instance and on appeal.
Orders
- Appeal upheld
- Judgment below set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment