The Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of NSW v AS [2018] NSWSC 664
A sentence of imprisonment is warranted for contempt in the face of the court where the offender, despite direction by the judge and warning of consequences, sustained refusal to answer questions in the context of serious drug supply offences, motivated by a plausible fear for personal and familial safety and expressed contrition. Appropriate penalty reflects sentencing discounts, gravity of conduct, and the accepted practice of considering totality of criminality.
- Parties
- Crown: Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of NSW; Defence: AS
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Decision
- Outcome
- conviction and sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- Contempt in the Face of the Court, Plea of Guilty, Wilful Refusal to Answer Questions, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of NSW
Crown
AS
Defence
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 What punishment should be imposed for contempt in the face of the court by wilful refusal to answer questions?
- 2 How should relevant subjective and objective factors be considered when sentencing for contempt?
Ratio Decidendi
A sentence of imprisonment is warranted for contempt in the face of the court where the offender, despite direction by the judge and warning of consequences, sustained refusal to answer questions in the context of serious drug supply offences, motivated by a plausible fear for personal and familial safety and expressed contrition. Appropriate penalty reflects sentencing discounts, gravity of conduct, and the accepted practice of considering totality of criminality.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentence imposed
Orders
- AS is convicted of the offence of contempt.
- AS is sentenced to a fixed term of nine months' imprisonment, commencing 1 November 2019 and expiring 31 July 2020.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment