A G and J R Keevers trading as Frontline Fences v Colin McQueen and Jennifer McQueen and Hadomall Pty Ltd Colin McQueen and Jennifer McQueen and Hadomall Pty Ltd v A G and J R Keevers trading as Frontline Fences [2014] NSWCATCD 137
The builders failed to clarify the fence line to be adopted and constructed the fence contrary to the plans and specifications and did not rectify deficiencies identified by the home owners' expert report. These failures breached the statutory warranties under Section 18B of the Home Building Act 1989 and the builders are liable for the cost of relocating the fence to the correct boundary line.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Building Claim / Final Decision
- Outcome
- money order for rectification costs offset by final contract sum owed
- Legal Topics
- ['contractual Warranties' 'proper and Workmanlike Manner' 'suitability for Purpose']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Building Claim / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['whether the builders failed to perform the work in a proper and workmanlike manner' 'whether the fence was constructed in accordance with the contract, plans, and specifications' 'whether the materials used were suitable for the purpose' 'whether the builders are liable for the cost of relocating the fence']
Ratio Decidendi
The builders failed to clarify the fence line to be adopted and constructed the fence contrary to the plans and specifications and did not rectify deficiencies identified by the home owners' expert report. These failures breached the statutory warranties under Section 18B of the Home Building Act 1989 and the builders are liable for the cost of relocating the fence to the correct boundary line.
Court Disposition
money order for rectification costs offset by final contract sum owed
Orders
- ['On or before 13 August 2014, the applicants/cross-respondents (home builders) are to pay the respondents/cross-applicants (home owners) the sum of $2,880.00']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment