(Re: Compton); Amaca v Seltsam [2005] NSWDDT 21
Contribution should be apportioned according to the causal contribution of each manufacturer's product to the plaintiff's mesothelioma, leading to a 10% contribution by Seltsam (Wunderlich) and 90% by Amaca (James Hardie), based on differences in product familiarity, exposure methods, and dust generated.
- Parties
- Cross Claimant: Amaca Pty Ltd (formerly known as James Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd); Cross Defendant: Seltsam Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Cross Claim for Contribution / Judgment
- Outcome
- Cross-defendant (Seltsam) ordered to contribute 10 per cent to damages and costs; cross-claimant (Amaca) 90 per cent. Seltsam to pay Amaca's costs as agreed or assessed.
- Legal Topics
- Contribution Among Tortfeasors, Asbestos Exposure, Causation in Mesothelioma Cases
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amaca Pty Ltd (formerly known as James Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd)
Cross Claimant
Seltsam Pty Ltd
Cross Defendant
Procedural Posture
Cross Claim for Contribution / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Extent of liability for contribution between manufacturers of asbestos products
- 2 Assessment of causal contribution to plaintiff's mesothelioma
Ratio Decidendi
Contribution should be apportioned according to the causal contribution of each manufacturer's product to the plaintiff's mesothelioma, leading to a 10% contribution by Seltsam (Wunderlich) and 90% by Amaca (James Hardie), based on differences in product familiarity, exposure methods, and dust generated.
Court Disposition
Cross-defendant (Seltsam) ordered to contribute 10 per cent to damages and costs; cross-claimant (Amaca) 90 per cent. Seltsam to pay Amaca's costs as agreed or assessed.
Orders
- Seltsam Pty Ltd to bear liability to contribute to damages awarded to plaintiff as to 10 per cent.
- Amaca Pty Ltd to bear liability to contribute to damages awarded to plaintiff as to 90 per cent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment