Conway Properties v Woollahra Municipal Council [2008] NSWLEC 1440
The Court determined that the proposed development does not cause unacceptable view loss given the minor impact on primary views, satisfaction of height controls, minor breach of storey requirements not affecting views, and compliance with planning criteria for view sharing under the applicable planning principles. The SEPP 1 objection to FSR was accepted as reasonable in the circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Judgment After Hearing and S34 Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'view Loss' 'local Environmental Plan' 'development Control Plan']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Judgment After Hearing and S34 Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed development causes unacceptable view loss to neighbouring properties' 'Whether the proposed building complies with planning controls including floor space ratio and building height' 'Whether a development standard should be varied under SEPP 1']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court determined that the proposed development does not cause unacceptable view loss given the minor impact on primary views, satisfaction of height controls, minor breach of storey requirements not affecting views, and compliance with planning criteria for view sharing under the applicable planning principles. The SEPP 1 objection to FSR was accepted as reasonable in the circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'DA 628/2007/1 for the demolition of two dwellings and ancillary structures, lot consolidation, and construction of a residential flat building is approved subject to conditions in Annexure A.' 'Exhibits returned except exhibit A.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment