Coolamon Shire Council v Sandhill Village Pty Lilmited & Ors [2010] NSWLEC 84
The building work depicted in the evidence required Council consent and there was conclusive evidence that no consent was in place; accordingly the declaration and agreed consequential orders were appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Enforcement / Ex Tempore Judgment on Agreed Declaration and Orders
- Outcome
- Declaration and agreed orders made; orders 4 and 5 stayed; liberty to apply granted; costs order made.
- Legal Topics
- ['building Work Without Development Consent' 'declaration by Consent' 'stay of Orders' 'costs' 'liberty to Apply']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Enforcement / Ex Tempore Judgment on Agreed Declaration and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether building work carried out on the Farmers Home Hotel required development consent.' 'Whether there was development consent in place for the building work.' 'Whether the Court should make the declaration and consequential orders agreed by the parties.']
Ratio Decidendi
The building work depicted in the evidence required Council consent and there was conclusive evidence that no consent was in place; accordingly the declaration and agreed consequential orders were appropriate.
Court Disposition
Declaration and agreed orders made; orders 4 and 5 stayed; liberty to apply granted; costs order made.
Orders
- ['The Court made the declaration in paragraph 1 of the short minutes.' 'The Court made the orders in paragraphs 2-5 on the joint and several basis in paragraph 11.' 'Orders 4 and 5 were stayed as provided in order 6.' 'Liberty to apply was granted as detailed in paragraphs 7-9.' 'The usual costs order was made in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment