Penny & Anor v Cooma-Monaro Shire Council [2003] NSWLEC 51
In the context of cl 15(1)(a) and the definition of "1997 holding" in the LEP, "direct vehicular access" means immediate access with no intervening land or roads between the Council-controlled road and the land. Portion 119 did not have that direct access and was not a "1997 holding". The definition of "1997 holding" was not a development standard because it was a definition of a land holding and did not fix a standard or specify a requirement in respect of an aspect of development. Clause 15(1)(a), read with that definition, operated as a prohibition on dwelling house development unless the land had the required characteristic, and did not constitute a development standard. The proposed...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Proceedings Concerning Refusal of a Development Application for a Dwelling House / Preliminary Point of Law
- Outcome
- Preliminary questions answered against the Applicants: the land was not a "1997 holding", the proposed development was prohibited, and the relevant LEP provisions were not development standards.
- Legal Topics
- ['meaning of "direct Vehicular Access"' 'definition of "1997 Holding" Under Cooma Monaro Local Environmental Plan 1999 (rural)' 'whether a Planning Provision Is a Development Standard' 'state Environmental Planning Policy No 1 Objection' 'prohibited Development in Zone 1(a) Rural Zone']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Proceedings Concerning Refusal of a Development Application for a Dwelling House / Preliminary Point of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Portion 119 DP750551, No 1730 Carlaminda Road, Carlaminda NSW is a "1997 holding" as defined pursuant to the Cooma-Monaro Local Environmental Plan 1999 - (Rural).' 'If the land is not a "1997 holding", whether the proposed dwelling house development is prohibited.' 'Whether cl 15(1)(a) of the Cooma-Monaro Local Environmental Plan 1999 - (Rural), read with the definition of "1997 holding", or the definition of "1997 holding" alone, constitutes a development standard as defined pursuant to the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.']
Ratio Decidendi
In the context of cl 15(1)(a) and the definition of "1997 holding" in the LEP, "direct vehicular access" means immediate access with no intervening land or roads between the Council-controlled road and the land. Portion 119 did not have that direct access and was not a "1997 holding". The definition of "1997 holding" was not a development standard because it was a definition of a land holding and did not fix a standard or specify a requirement in respect of an aspect of development. Clause 15(1)(a), read with that definition, operated as a prohibition on dwelling house development unless the land had the required characteristic, and did not constitute a development standard. The proposed...
Court Disposition
Preliminary questions answered against the Applicants: the land was not a "1997 holding", the proposed development was prohibited, and the relevant LEP provisions were not development standards.
Orders
- ['Question 1: Portion 119 DP750551, No 1730 Carlaminda Road, Carlaminda NSW is not a "1997 holding" as defined pursuant to the LEP.' 'Question 2: The development proposed is prohibited.' 'Question 3(a): Not answered.' 'Question 3(b): Clause 15(1)(a) of the LEP when read with the definition of "1997 holding" in the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment