Coonamble Local Aboriginal Land Council v Attorney General of New South Wales [2023] FCA 938
Native title does not exist over the subject land because the original grants in fee simple in 1867 constituted previous exclusive possession acts, which, under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and supported by case law, permanently extinguished native title.
- Parties
- Applicant: Coonamble Local Aboriginal Land Council; First Respondent: Attorney General of New South Wales; Second Respondent: NTSCORP Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Non Claimant Application for Determination of Native Title / Final Determination; Orders Made Without Hearing Under S 86 G
- Outcome
- Application granted; determination that native title does not exist
- Legal Topics
- Non Claimant Application, Negative Determination, Extinguishment of Native Title, Procedural Requirements Under Native Title Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Coonamble Local Aboriginal Land Council
Applicant
Attorney General of New South Wales
First Respondent
NTSCORP Limited
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Non Claimant Application for Determination of Native Title / Final Determination; Orders Made Without Hearing Under S 86 G
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether native title exists in respect of the subject land
- 2 Whether native title has been extinguished by previous acts
- 3 Whether the Court has power and it is appropriate to make orders sought under s 86G
Ratio Decidendi
Native title does not exist over the subject land because the original grants in fee simple in 1867 constituted previous exclusive possession acts, which, under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and supported by case law, permanently extinguished native title.
Court Disposition
Application granted; determination that native title does not exist
Orders
- Native title does not exist in relation to the land in the State of New South Wales comprised in and known as Lots 1 and 2 in Deposited Plan 1036815.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment