Scott v Hunter New England Local Health District [2018] NSWDC 361
The interrogatories sought are unnecessary given the existence of contemporaneous medical records addressing the matters in issue, fail to establish special reasons, and are oppressive due to their direction at recollections eight years old; therefore, the notice of motion must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Ruling on Notice of Motion to Answer Interrogatories
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's notice of motion dismissed; costs in the proceedings; directions given concerning expert evidence and further case management.
- Legal Topics
- ['interrogatories' 'necessity' 'special Reasons' 'bodily Injury Claims' 'expert Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Ruling on Notice of Motion to Answer Interrogatories
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether there are 'special reasons' justifying interrogatories in a bodily injury claim" 'Whether the interrogatories are necessary under Uniform Civil Procedure Rule 22.1(4)' 'Whether interrogatories can be directed to recollections and thoughts of individuals eight years ago']
Ratio Decidendi
The interrogatories sought are unnecessary given the existence of contemporaneous medical records addressing the matters in issue, fail to establish special reasons, and are oppressive due to their direction at recollections eight years old; therefore, the notice of motion must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's notice of motion dismissed; costs in the proceedings; directions given concerning expert evidence and further case management.
Orders
- ["Plaintiff's notice of motion filed 31 January 2018 be dismissed." "First defendant's costs be costs in the proceedings." 'Direct that any expert report by the plaintiff be served by 23 July 2018.' 'Stand the matter over for directions on Monday, 30 July 2018 before the presiding judge.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment