Cooperative Bulk Handling Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 508
CBH satisfies both the positive criterion of being established for the purpose of promoting the development of Australian agricultural resources and the negative criterion of not being carried on for the profit or gain of its individual members for the purposes of s 50-1, s 50-40 Item 8.2 of the ITAA 1997. Its activities, constitution, and history demonstrate the dominant objective is the advancement of the grain industry overall, not the profit of members. Legislative and constitutional prohibitions effectively prevent profit or asset distribution to individual members. Accordingly, CBH is entitled to income tax exemption for the relevant years in question.
- Parties
- Applicant: Cooperative Bulk Handling Ltd; Respondent: Commissioner of Taxation
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (cth) / Judgment Following Hearing of an Appeal Against an Objection Decision Regarding a Private Tax Ruling
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax Exemption, Private Tax Rulings, Interpretation of Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (cth) S 50 40, Not for Profit Criteria, Development of Australian Agricultural Resources, Application of Profit/gain Test for Members
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cooperative Bulk Handling Ltd
Applicant
Commissioner of Taxation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Part IVC of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (cth) / Judgment Following Hearing of an Appeal Against an Objection Decision Regarding a Private Tax Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether CBH is exempt from income tax under s 50-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) as an entity established for the purpose of promoting the development of Australian agricultural resources under s 50-40, Item 8.2, and is not carried on for the profit or gain of its individual members
Ratio Decidendi
CBH satisfies both the positive criterion of being established for the purpose of promoting the development of Australian agricultural resources and the negative criterion of not being carried on for the profit or gain of its individual members for the purposes of s 50-1, s 50-40 Item 8.2 of the ITAA 1997. Its activities, constitution, and history demonstrate the dominant objective is the advancement of the grain industry overall, not the profit of members. Legislative and constitutional prohibitions effectively prevent profit or asset distribution to individual members. Accordingly, CBH is entitled to income tax exemption for the relevant years in question.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed.
Orders
- The appeal be allowed.
- The objection decision of the respondent, notice of which was issued on 25 November 2008, be set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment