R v Farrell [2016] NSWSC 1278
The vacation of the original trial date and resultant significant delay constituted a change in circumstances justifying the hearing of a further bail application. The applicant demonstrated that, with stringent bail conditions, there is no unacceptable risk and that lengthy pre-trial detention is not justified; therefore, the show cause requirement was satisfied and bail must be granted.
- Parties
- Applicant: Corey George Farrell; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / Further Bail Application After Previous Refusal
- Outcome
- Bail granted
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Show Cause Offences, Delay Before Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Corey George Farrell
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Further Bail Application After Previous Refusal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a further bail application can be heard after previous refusal due to changed circumstances
- 2 Proper approach to show cause requirement in bail applications for serious indictable offences involving firearms
- 3 Weight of delay in trial as a factor in grant of bail
Ratio Decidendi
The vacation of the original trial date and resultant significant delay constituted a change in circumstances justifying the hearing of a further bail application. The applicant demonstrated that, with stringent bail conditions, there is no unacceptable risk and that lengthy pre-trial detention is not justified; therefore, the show cause requirement was satisfied and bail must be granted.
Court Disposition
Bail granted
Orders
- Bail granted to Corey George Farrell with strict conditions to address identified bail concerns.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment