Regina v Corey Styman [2005] NSWCCA 129
The sentencing judge acted within discretion in extending the parole period due to special circumstances without increasing the head sentence beyond what was otherwise warranted; the total sentence and non-parole period were not manifestly excessive and reflected the seriousness of the offence and criminal history, and low intellectual function did not require a different approach to deterrence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence' 'comparison of Co Offender Sentences' 'intellectual Functioning and Deterrence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in extending the parole period and increasing the overall sentence due to finding special circumstances' 'Whether the sentence imposed is manifestly excessive' 'Whether low intellectual functioning affects sentencing for deterrence']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge acted within discretion in extending the parole period due to special circumstances without increasing the head sentence beyond what was otherwise warranted; the total sentence and non-parole period were not manifestly excessive and reflected the seriousness of the offence and criminal history, and low intellectual function did not require a different approach to deterrence.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment