Cornick Pty Ltd v Brains Master Corporation [1995] FCA 1125

Cornick Pty Ltd v Brains Master Corporation [1995] FCA 1125

Documents placed at the registered office at 5.45pm constituted valid service within the meaning of s459E(1) of the Corporations Law. Forwarding a copy of the demand to a different address does not constitute separate service and does not affect the respondent's reliance on the original service.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 December 1995
Procedural Posture
Corporations Matter / Determination of Preliminary Questions Prior to Hearing of Application Under S459 G(1)
Outcome
Application dismissed, preliminary questions answered Yes and No respectively.
Legal Topics
['service of Statutory Demand' 'service at Registered Office' 'effectiveness of Service After Business Hours']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Corporations Matter / Determination of Preliminary Questions Prior to Hearing of Application Under S459 G(1)

  1. 1 ['Whether placing documents at 5.45pm under the door of registered office constitutes service under s459E(1) of the Corporations Law' 'Whether forwarding a copy of the notice to a different address constitutes separate service for the purposes of s459G of the Corporations Law']

Ratio Decidendi

Documents placed at the registered office at 5.45pm constituted valid service within the meaning of s459E(1) of the Corporations Law. Forwarding a copy of the demand to a different address does not constitute separate service and does not affect the respondent's reliance on the original service.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed, preliminary questions answered Yes and No respectively.

Orders

  • ['Parties directed to bring in proposed orders within 7 days in accordance with the reasons.']