Corrective Services NSW v Danwer [2013] NSWIRComm 61
The Commission erred at first instance in applying a repudiation-based test rather than weighing all relevant factors under the statutory regime; objectively, the dismissal was not harsh given the gravity of the offence, lack of remorse, incompatibility of attitude with core duties, and public interest. Orders reinstating Mr Danwer were set aside and quashed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal of Unfair Dismissal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; previous reinstatement decision set aside and orders quashed.
- Legal Topics
- ['unfair Dismissal' 'public Sector Employment' 'disciplinary Action' 'harshness Test' 'repudiation' 'role of Off Duty Conduct']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal of Unfair Dismissal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether dismissal of public sector employee convicted of a serious offence was harsh, unjust or unreasonable under Industrial Relations Act 1996' 'Proper approach to considering harshness of dismissal under s 48 Public Sector Employment and Management Act 2002' "Connection between employee's attitude to conviction and suitability for duties as a prison officer"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission erred at first instance in applying a repudiation-based test rather than weighing all relevant factors under the statutory regime; objectively, the dismissal was not harsh given the gravity of the offence, lack of remorse, incompatibility of attitude with core duties, and public interest. Orders reinstating Mr Danwer were set aside and quashed.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; previous reinstatement decision set aside and orders quashed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal is granted.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'The decision given on 27 May 2013 by Newall C in Matter IRC 1241 of 2012 is set aside and the orders quashed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment