Zhu v Yingle Culture Exchange (Australia) Pty Ltd ACN 113 089 759 (In Liquidation) (No 3) [2010] NSWSC 558
Plaintiffs were substantially successful on their notice of motion for discovery; no good reason exists to depart from the ordinary rule that costs follow the event. Costs are awarded to the plaintiffs to be paid by the second and third defendants, as agreed or assessed, and at the conclusion of proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Motion / Costs Determination Following Notice of Motion for Discovery
- Outcome
- Orders as to costs and consequential orders made
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'discovery' 'consequential Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motion / Costs Determination Following Notice of Motion for Discovery
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Should the second and third defendants pay the plaintiffs' costs of the notice of motion for discovery?" 'Is there any reason to depart from the ordinary order that costs follow the event?']
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiffs were substantially successful on their notice of motion for discovery; no good reason exists to depart from the ordinary rule that costs follow the event. Costs are awarded to the plaintiffs to be paid by the second and third defendants, as agreed or assessed, and at the conclusion of proceedings.
Court Disposition
Orders as to costs and consequential orders made
Orders
- ['Order (iii) of 26 February 2010 be set aside' "Second and third defendants pay the plaintiffs' costs of and incidental to the notice of motion filed 21 August 2009, as agreed or assessed" 'To the extent not otherwise determined, the aforesaid notice of motion is dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment