Peter Voutos and Irene Voutos v Michael Trajcevski and Snez Trajcevski [2014] NSWCATCD 122
The applicants, having no standing in relation to the common property of the strata scheme and having commenced misconceived proceedings, must pay the respondents' costs, as the respondents were entitled to indemnification as successful parties.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Renewal of Claim; Costs Application / Decision on Costs After Withdrawal of Application
- Outcome
- Applicants to pay respondents' costs as agreed or assessed; no order in relation to file HB 12/32193.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'standing' 'strata Schemes']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Renewal of Claim; Costs Application / Decision on Costs After Withdrawal of Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether applicants should be ordered to pay respondents' costs" 'Whether applicants had standing to bring proceedings regarding common property of strata scheme' 'Whether Tribunal could set aside earlier consent orders']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants, having no standing in relation to the common property of the strata scheme and having commenced misconceived proceedings, must pay the respondents' costs, as the respondents were entitled to indemnification as successful parties.
Court Disposition
Applicants to pay respondents' costs as agreed or assessed; no order in relation to file HB 12/32193.
Orders
- ["The applicants shall pay the respondents' costs in these proceedings as agreed or assessed on the ordinary basis within 14 days of agreement or assessment." 'No order is made in relation to file HB 12/32193.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment