Baygol Pty Ltd v Foamex Polystyrene Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1089
There were no special or unusual features warranting departure from the ordinary party and party costs order; the proceedings, though unsuccessful, were not baseless or unreasonably conducted, and the Calderbank offer did not merit indemnity costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application Following Patent Litigation / Post Judgment Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Application for solicitor and client costs refused; costs awarded to respondent on party and party basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'patents' 'joinder of Parties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Application Following Patent Litigation / Post Judgment Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether solicitor and client costs should be awarded to the respondent' 'Whether proceedings disclosed special or unusual features to warrant a special costs order' 'Effect of Calderbank offer on costs determination']
Ratio Decidendi
There were no special or unusual features warranting departure from the ordinary party and party costs order; the proceedings, though unsuccessful, were not baseless or unreasonably conducted, and the Calderbank offer did not merit indemnity costs.
Court Disposition
Application for solicitor and client costs refused; costs awarded to respondent on party and party basis.
Orders
- ['The application is refused.' 'The applicant is to pay the costs of the respondent of the appeal and this application for indemnity costs on a party and party basis.' 'The matter is stood over for further directions on 16 August 2005 at 9:30 am.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment