Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd v Papantoniou (No. 3) [2014] NSWSC 885
The Calderbank offer was not a genuine attempt at compromise but effectively called for capitulation; rejection of the offer was not ‘relevantly unreasonable’ under the circumstances. The Court declined to exercise discretion to award indemnity costs, confirming costs orders previously made.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Costs Order Following Substantive Judgment
- Outcome
- Indemnity costs application dismissed; previous costs orders confirmed
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Offers' 'contracts Review Act 1980 (nsw)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Costs Order Following Substantive Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Calderbank offer was a genuine compromise' 'Whether rejection of Calderbank offer was unreasonable' 'Whether indemnity costs should be awarded']
Ratio Decidendi
The Calderbank offer was not a genuine attempt at compromise but effectively called for capitulation; rejection of the offer was not ‘relevantly unreasonable’ under the circumstances. The Court declined to exercise discretion to award indemnity costs, confirming costs orders previously made.
Court Disposition
Indemnity costs application dismissed; previous costs orders confirmed
Orders
- ['The unsuccessful party, Mrs Papantoniou, is to have her costs of this application on the ordinary basis']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment