C2C Investments Pty Ltd, in the matter of C2C Investments Pty Ltd v Leigh [2011] FCA 307
Because the first and second plaintiffs failed to pay the taxed costs within 30 days of demand, the proceedings were stayed in accordance with the prior consent order, and thus orders 2 and 3 made on 7 March 2011 were vacated.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: C2C Investments Pty Ltd ACN 102 331 840; Second Plaintiff: Geoffrey Anthony Shannon; First Defendant: David John Leigh trading as PPB (Northern NSW) (a firm); Second Defendant: Registrar General of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Vacation of Orders and Costs
- Outcome
- orders 2 and 3 of 7 March 2011 vacated; first defendant awarded costs of the application; proceedings stayed pending payment of costs
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Stay of Proceedings, Vacation of Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C2C Investments Pty Ltd ACN 102 331 840
First Plaintiff
Geoffrey Anthony Shannon
Second Plaintiff
David John Leigh trading as PPB (Northern NSW) (a firm)
First Defendant
Registrar General of New South Wales
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Vacation of Orders and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether orders 2 and 3 made on 7 March 2011 should be vacated
- 2 Effect of non-payment of taxed costs on continuation of proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Because the first and second plaintiffs failed to pay the taxed costs within 30 days of demand, the proceedings were stayed in accordance with the prior consent order, and thus orders 2 and 3 made on 7 March 2011 were vacated.
Court Disposition
orders 2 and 3 of 7 March 2011 vacated; first defendant awarded costs of the application; proceedings stayed pending payment of costs
Orders
- Orders 2 and 3 made on 7 March 2011 be vacated.
- The first plaintiff and the second plaintiff pay the first defendant's costs of and incidental to the appearance on 28 March 2011.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment