Macquarie Underwriting Pty Ltd v Permanent Custodians Limited (No 2) [2007] FCAFC 108
Given both parties had relative successes and failures and the interlocutory nature of the applications, costs of the motions before the primary judge and on appeal should be costs in the cause in proceeding NSD 1758 of 2004, to abide the outcome of the claims by Permanent against the Insurers.
- Parties
- First Appellant: Macquarie Underwriting Pty Ltd; Second Appellant: SVB Syndicates Limited; First Respondent: Permanent Custodians Limited; Second Respondent: ARMA Pty Limited; Third Respondent: Neil Teves
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment Costs Order
- Outcome
- Costs order made; costs of specified motions and the appeal to be costs in the cause in proceeding NSD 1758 of 2004 to abide the outcome of the claims.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Joinder of Parties, Insurance Claims, Leave to Commence Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Macquarie Underwriting Pty Ltd
First Appellant
SVB Syndicates Limited
Second Appellant
Permanent Custodians Limited
First Respondent
ARMA Pty Limited
Second Respondent
Neil Teves
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Entitlement to costs following partial success on appeal relating to joinder under s 6 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW)
- 2 Whether costs should follow event or be costs in the cause
Ratio Decidendi
Given both parties had relative successes and failures and the interlocutory nature of the applications, costs of the motions before the primary judge and on appeal should be costs in the cause in proceeding NSD 1758 of 2004, to abide the outcome of the claims by Permanent against the Insurers.
Court Disposition
Costs order made; costs of specified motions and the appeal to be costs in the cause in proceeding NSD 1758 of 2004 to abide the outcome of the claims.
Orders
- The costs of the motion that was the subject of the judgments of the primary judge on 29 May 2006 and 4 July 2006 and the costs of the appeal be costs in proceeding NSD 1758 of 2004 to abide the outcome of the claims made by the first respondent against the appellants in that proceeding.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment