Peter Vitek & Anor v Estate Homes Pty Ltd & Ors (Costs) [2013] NSWSC 1948
The January 2005 and September 2013 letters were not sufficient Calderbank offers to warrant indemnity costs, but the plaintiffs are entitled to indemnity costs for matters arising from the notices to admit which were unreasonably not admitted by the third defendant; all other costs are ordered on the usual basis payable by the third defendant.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Peter Vitek; Second Plaintiff: Shoshanna Vitek; Third Defendant: Veeda Taheri
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application / Post Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders made for costs; third defendant to pay plaintiffs' costs arising out of notices to admit on an indemnity basis; all other costs to be paid by the third defendant to the plaintiffs on the usual basis.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Indemnity Costs, Calderbank Offer, Notices to Admit
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Vitek
First Plaintiff
Shoshanna Vitek
Second Plaintiff
Veeda Taheri
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Application / Post Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs should be awarded costs on an indemnity basis
- 2 Whether the letter of 31 January 2005 constituted a Calderbank offer
- 3 Whether the letter of 25 September 2013 was a Calderbank offer
Ratio Decidendi
The January 2005 and September 2013 letters were not sufficient Calderbank offers to warrant indemnity costs, but the plaintiffs are entitled to indemnity costs for matters arising from the notices to admit which were unreasonably not admitted by the third defendant; all other costs are ordered on the usual basis payable by the third defendant.
Court Disposition
Orders made for costs; third defendant to pay plaintiffs' costs arising out of notices to admit on an indemnity basis; all other costs to be paid by the third defendant to the plaintiffs on the usual basis.
Orders
- The third defendant is to pay the plaintiffs' costs arising out of the notices to admit on an indemnity basis.
- All other costs to be paid by the third defendant to the plaintiffs on the usual basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment