General Motors Acceptance Corporation Australia v Marshall [2002] FCA 1057

General Motors Acceptance Corporation Australia v Marshall [2002] FCA 1057

Costs of the original petitioner up to substitution and of the substituted petitioner thereafter should be paid out of the bankrupt estate, as the debtor would have persisted with unsuccessful arguments regardless, and the actions of the petitioning creditors were for the benefit of creditors generally.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 August 2002
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Costs Determination After Judgment
Outcome
Costs order
Legal Topics
['costs in Bankruptcy Proceedings' 'petitioning Creditor Costs' 'bankrupt Estate']
['bankruptcy'] ['costs in Bankruptcy Proceedings' 'petitioning Creditor Costs' 'bankrupt Estate']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy / Costs Determination After Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether costs should be paid out of the bankrupt estate to the original and substituted petitioning creditors.' 'Whether the original petitioning creditor is entitled to costs after substitution.']

Ratio Decidendi

Costs of the original petitioner up to substitution and of the substituted petitioner thereafter should be paid out of the bankrupt estate, as the debtor would have persisted with unsuccessful arguments regardless, and the actions of the petitioning creditors were for the benefit of creditors generally.

Court Disposition

Costs order

Orders

  • ['The costs of General Motors Acceptance Corporation Australia (including reserved costs) and the costs of EA Bourne Pty Limited up to and including 13 December 2001 of and incidental to the petition be taxed and paid out of the estate of the bankrupt in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).' 'The costs of...