Borcherdt v Scott [2013] NSWCA 417
The detained goods proceedings were conceded to involve an appeal as of right because the claimed value exceeded $100,000 and there was a realistic prospect of obtaining $100,000 or more if the appeal succeeded. The bulldozer loan proceedings and loans proceedings did not meet the threshold and required leave, but because all three Local Court proceedings involved common material, including issues about an alleged partnership, leave should be granted to the extent necessary to avoid inconsistent determinations and allow the related appeals to proceed together.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal and Notice of Motion to Dismiss Appeal / Court of Appeal Proceedings From Supreme Court Decision Dismissing Appeals From Local Court Proceedings
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted to the extent necessary and proceedings listed before the Registrar for directions for preparation of the appeal for hearing.
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'appeal as of Right' 'monetary Threshold for Appeal' 'local Court Appeals to Supreme Court' 'common Material Across Related Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal and Notice of Motion to Dismiss Appeal / Court of Appeal Proceedings From Supreme Court Decision Dismissing Appeals From Local Court Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal was required under s 101(2)(r) of the Supreme Court Act 1970 in relation to any one or more of three Local Court proceedings' 'Whether the detained goods proceedings involved a matter at issue amounting to or of the value of $100,000 or more' 'Whether leave should be granted for the bulldozer loan proceedings and the loans proceedings if the detained goods proceedings could proceed as an appeal as of right']
Ratio Decidendi
The detained goods proceedings were conceded to involve an appeal as of right because the claimed value exceeded $100,000 and there was a realistic prospect of obtaining $100,000 or more if the appeal succeeded. The bulldozer loan proceedings and loans proceedings did not meet the threshold and required leave, but because all three Local Court proceedings involved common material, including issues about an alleged partnership, leave should be granted to the extent necessary to avoid inconsistent determinations and allow the related appeals to proceed together.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted to the extent necessary and proceedings listed before the Registrar for directions for preparation of the appeal for hearing.
Orders
- ['To the extent that leave to appeal is necessary in appeal proceedings 2013 of 292118, leave be granted.' 'The proceedings be listed before the Registrar of the Court of Appeal for directions in relation to the preparation of the appeal for hearing.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment