Inspector Barry Malone v Country Energy [2003] NSWIRComm 369
Clause 7 of the Energy Services Corporations (Dissolution of Energy Distributors) Regulation 2001 made Country Energy the universal successor of Advance Energy for all purposes, and the Minister's Order treated the business as a continuing going concern. In that statutory context, the legislative intention was that...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Prosecution Under S 15(1) of Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 / Defendant's Notice of Motion Challenging the Court's Jurisdiction to Deal With the Prosecution
- Outcome
- The defendant's jurisdictional challenge failed; the notice of motion was dismissed and the prosecution may proceed against Country Energy.
- Legal Topics
- ['transfer of Criminal Liability on Dissolution of Statutory Corporation' 'universal Successor' 'successor Statutory Corporation' 'jurisdiction to Prosecute Successor Entity']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Prosecution Under S 15(1) of Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 / Defendant's Notice of Motion Challenging the Court's Jurisdiction to Deal With the Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Country Energy was the successor to Advance Energy for the purposes of liability under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983.' 'Whether the legislative scheme transferred criminal liability of Advance Energy to Country Energy after Advance Energy was dissolved.' 'Whether the expression "universal successor" applying "for all purposes" was sufficient to include criminal liability.']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 7 of the Energy Services Corporations (Dissolution of Energy Distributors) Regulation 2001 made Country Energy the universal successor of Advance Energy for all purposes, and the Minister's Order treated the business as a continuing going concern. In that statutory context, the legislative intention was that Country Energy stepped into the shoes of Advance Energy and had transferred to it, among other things, Advance Energy's criminal liability. Country Energy was therefore properly named in the charge and the Court could proceed to hear it.
Court Disposition
The defendant's jurisdictional challenge failed; the notice of motion was dismissed and the prosecution may proceed against Country Energy.
Orders
- ['The orders sought by the defendant in its notice of motion are refused.' 'The motion is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment