United Firefighters' Union of Australia & Anor v Country Fire Authority [1997] FCA 851
Clause 9.5 of the Certified Agreement does not compel the Authority to appoint an internal applicant to a position at a new career fire station on preserved penalty terms before advertising externally. The Authority retains flexibility to set the terms and make appointments as per the Certified Agreement, and only calls for expressions of interest or orders of transfer if staffing requirements are otherwise unmet. Consequently, there was no contravention of s 298K of the Act and no basis for penalty or further injunctive relief.
- Parties
- First Applicant: United Firefighters' Union of Australia; Second Applicant: Andrew Marmion; Respondent: Country Fire Authority
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Penalty and Injunction / Final Judgment After Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Certified Agreements Interpretation, Workplace Relations Act 1996, Industrial Instruments, Remuneration Entitlements, Staffing of New Career Fire Stations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
United Firefighters' Union of Australia
First Applicant
Andrew Marmion
Second Applicant
Country Fire Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Penalty and Injunction / Final Judgment After Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of clause 9.5 of the Country Fire Authority/United Firefighters' Union Firefighters and Fire Officers' Certified Agreement 1996
- 2 Whether the respondent was obliged to appoint an internal applicant on existing terms before advertising externally
- 3 Whether refusal to appoint Mr Marmion breached s 298K of the Workplace Relations Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 9.5 of the Certified Agreement does not compel the Authority to appoint an internal applicant to a position at a new career fire station on preserved penalty terms before advertising externally. The Authority retains flexibility to set the terms and make appointments as per the Certified Agreement, and only calls for expressions of interest or orders of transfer if staffing requirements are otherwise unmet. Consequently, there was no contravention of s 298K of the Act and no basis for penalty or further injunctive relief.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The injunction granted on 13 August 1997 is dissolved.
- Liberty reserved to the respondent to apply in respect of the undertaking as to damages given by the first applicant on 13 August 1997.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment