Dudzinski v Harris [2002] FCA 800

Dudzinski v Harris [2002] FCA 800

The applicants' motion for extension of time is dismissed as there is no point in fixing a time for making such application; the applicants must bear the consequence of any delay and are to pay respondents' costs of today.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 May 2002
Procedural Posture
Motion for Extension of Time Prior to Trial
Outcome
Motion for extension of time dismissed; applicants to pay respondents’ costs of today.
Legal Topics
[]
[]

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Motion for Extension of Time Prior to Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether extension of time should be granted for application to amend statement of claim' "Who should bear costs for today's hearing"]

Ratio Decidendi

The applicants' motion for extension of time is dismissed as there is no point in fixing a time for making such application; the applicants must bear the consequence of any delay and are to pay respondents' costs of today.

Court Disposition

Motion for extension of time dismissed; applicants to pay respondents’ costs of today.

Orders

  • ['The motion for extension of time is dismissed.' 'The applicants pay the respondents costs of today.']