C Incorporated v Australian Crime Commission (No 2) [2010] FCAFC 27

C Incorporated v Australian Crime Commission (No 2) [2010] FCAFC 27

The Commonwealth not having sought any order for costs, the appropriate order is that there be no order for the costs of the appeal, the cross-appeal, or the hearing before the trial judge.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 March 2010
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Order on Costs Following Appeal
Outcome
No order as to costs for appeal, cross-appeal, or hearing before trial judge.
Legal Topics
[]

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Order on Costs Following Appeal

  1. 1 []

Ratio Decidendi

The Commonwealth not having sought any order for costs, the appropriate order is that there be no order for the costs of the appeal, the cross-appeal, or the hearing before the trial judge.

Court Disposition

No order as to costs for appeal, cross-appeal, or hearing before trial judge.

Orders

  • ['There be no order for the costs of the appeal.' 'There be no order for the costs of the cross-appeal.' 'There be no order as to the costs of the hearing before the trial judge.']