HARRIS V. SMITH

HARRIS V. SMITH

The verdict was low but not unreasonably so; the reasons in the majority judgments in the Supreme Court are adopted.

Parties
Advocate: Mr. Smith; Advocate: Mr. Evatt
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 November 1963
Procedural Posture
Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr. Smith

Advocate

Mr. Evatt

Advocate

Procedural Posture

Appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The verdict was low but not unreasonably so; the reasons in the majority judgments in the Supreme Court are adopted.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The appeal will be dismissed with costs.